I swear I haven't read anything new in the last few weeks. Everyone seems to be saying the same things, only in different words.
I could happily sum up the last few articles I've read on Extensive Reading/Narrow Reading and Repeated Reading thus:
"He said this. She said that. I did a study using a statistically insignificant group of people and a dodgy methodology. I found nothing conclusive, but it looked like this and that are both possibly true".
Is this because nothing new has happened in the field? Or is it because everyone keeps citing themselves?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Newest post
Tough and Competent, or: Ad Astra per Aspera
For some time, I had a badly drawn image of the Apollo 1 Command Module on my desk. I recently replaced it when I needed a badge design to u...
Popular posts
-
"Nobody reads The Iliad ." Helen had been telling me about the Kindle App, which she had downloaded onto her smartphone. With g...
-
I’ve been looking more closely at Esperanto lately, and I must admit it is a fascinating thing to look at. When you look at what it wa...
-
As I’m writing this, I’m wearing a T-shirt with a well-known bat logo on it. It’s not my first such t-shirt, and it won’t be my last. I...
No comments:
Post a Comment